>Both freedom and socialism can take care of the poor. When
>the deed is done freely, both the giver and the receiver
>can be blessed and exalted. When the deed is done by
>compulsion, the giver gives at the point of the government gun of power,
>and the recipient only grows more hungry as his soul is poisoned by the
>forced handout.
July 6, 1999
One of the main problems I see is the infrastructure of international banking and trade
. The centers of international trade CONTROL much of the planets wealth, and create a
system of eco-political DEPENDENCE [as opposed to INDEPENDENCE] among nations who have
become addicted to the loans of the international 'banksters' and traders... and thus
their God given sense of self reliance is destroyed.
Scotland won a bloody battle with England to win their political
"independence", however they were later seduced into becoming part of the
British "common-wealth" and thus all of the blood that was spilled to win their
political sovereignty was for naught. They lost their political independence because they
had lost their economic independence. In fact, I will go so far as to say that it is
IMPOSSIBLE to maintain political indepencence without maintaining economic independence as
well.
Thus the 'patriot' who had become indebted to his creditors, buys merchandise that is
made in China rather than America, dutifully bears his social security card and so on...
has no place to condemn "the government" for selling out our national
independence, for in trading their sovereignty for materialistic security [i.e. throwing
their lot into the global pyramid economy by taking advantage of its illusory
"benefits"] they are feeding the very global economy which they accuse of
destroying our liberties.
This type of eco-political collectivism [whether using the title of corporate fascism,
communism, capitalism, etc., - for instance capitalism being simply a monopoly controlled
state and communism a state controlled monopoly, two sides of the same Machievellian coin]
has resulted in more suffering in the 20th century than will every be known. For instance
many African tribes were doing just fine until western corporate parasites began to
INTERVENE by convincing the local farmers to give up their traditional self-sufficient
farming ways and instead grow "cash crops" for the big western countries:
cotton, coffee, sugar, tobacco, etc., and the companies would pay the men for growing the
cash crops, who could in turn theoretically go into the cities/towns and buy food for
their families.
So while the African men BS'd in the villages, the women and children slaved away
harvesting by hand what the big companies planted by machine. On pay day the African men
took the money and went into town, and once having passed through the western money traps
-- gambling, drinking, prostitutes, and other lures designed to make a profit off of the
addictions of man, they had no money left to feed their families... so their families
starved! They could not really live off of a steady diet of cotton, coffee, sugar and
tobacco could they? THIS was the real reason for the so-called "Ethiopian
famine" of some years ago. An act of MAN, not of God. The "Communists"
might in light of this seem to be justified in their condemnation of
"Capitalism", if not for the fact that Communism was SPAWNED by International
banking groups for a specific purpose, some of these modern groups being the CFR, Federal
Reserve, IMF, Trilateral Commission, IRS, Bildebergers, and so on... who actually control
Washington D.C. in that they control the Military INDUSTRIAL Fraternity, which in turn
controls the Executive branch of government, which in turn controls the wimps in Congress
who long ago have collectively sold out to the big money powers.
Native Americans say that man is supposed to live in balance with the "earth"
and grow his own food [today there are about 2-3 people out of every 100 who still farm
the land - a frightening thought if you consider the possibility that Y2K might cause a
breakdown in the agricultural system]. The Indians say that the "earth mother"
will one day become angry that man has forsaken her provision and trusted rather in money
pyramids... so when their money pyramids collapse because those at the top in their
insatiable greed continue to steal from the 'foundations' of the pyramid in order to build
their lofty positions ever higher, the earth mother will laugh and refuse to provide the
fruit of the ground to those who traded self-responsibility for materialistic gain
[usually through exploitation and at the expense of the weak here and abroad].
Also, look at the European Common Market, once called the European Economic Community.
That movement united Europe economically... but NOW see how subtly the
"economic" part has been removed and the "European Community" is
becoming more and more a single political force [as the sovereign states of the USA lost
much of their independence to the District of Columbia] as the manipulators push for a
unified European political "constitution". That is why I believe that ECONOMIC
BOUDARIES should be as important as POLITICAL BOUNDARIES. A child knows that you don't
stack all of your dominoes together, or put ALL of your eggs in one basket. Every
community, town, city should care for IT'S OWN WELFARE rather than have the "Federal
government" doing so, and thus destroying self-responsibility and independence.
Imports and exports between regional boundaries should be strictly regulated so as to
keep sovereignties from becoming over-dependent on each other. For instance we send big
companies over to Africa or Asia in order to grow our cotton, and in doing so putting
people in America out of work, because the Africans will accept 15 cents an hour, while in
the meantime our interfering in and plundering these foreign economies causes those
foreign economies to eventually collapse, thus putting the companies overseas in a bind,
and so the companies bribe some people in government to pass laws for U.S. taxpayers to
BAIL THEM OUT. I would suggest that if a corporation wishes to "expand" into
another national sovereignty, then this should be considered an act of economic treason
[taking jobs away from those at home]. They should be told, "Fine, but you're out of
here... your citizenship has been revoked. Have fun in your new home."
So international economics is destructive, if not satanic, if not in its intent than in
its effects. I would suggest that all sovereign economies who wish to remain strong and
independent [rather than be a perpetual slave to global bankers, surrendering more and
more of their resources and sovereignty as "collateral" against the loans which
they can barely pay the interest on, if that...] import and export no more than 1/3rd of
any product and produce the other 2/3rd themselves, so that if one economy goes under it
will not take the rest with them, because they will have the 2/3rds of their
self-productive economy to fall back on. But maybe it's too late for that. Maybe that was
the plan all along? That is, to make the world so CO-DEPENDENT that when the whole dominoe
field collapses, an even more deadly economic pyramid will rise from the ashes [of Y2K? -
i.e. those who will have the billions of dollars needed to make their 'system' year 2000
compatable] and offer to provide temporal 'salvation' to anyone who is willing to sell
their eternal soul to the pit...
Sincerely,
Alan
alandewalton@hotmail.com
Return to Essay on Amerca as Beast
