Every time the US government engages in a major media
event intent upon provoking the public to supporting a hidden leftist agenda,
they make mistakes and leave untidy bits of evidence which shows the telltale
marks of collusion. I am going to present to you some of this evidence to
demonstrate that the Elian Gonzales case has little to do with reuniting
a father with an unwilling son. This is a power-play between the Clinton's and
Castro trying to discredit the Cuban American community so as to help
facilitate the normalization of US relations with Cuba. There is a lot
of media propaganda going on here as well as government cover-up and deception
necessary to keep this agenda hidden.
One of my subscribers asked me if I wouldn't explain the process of how I
go about analyzing news and discovering the signs of collusion, so that he
could begin to do this on his own. This case presents an ideal opportunity to
discuss a key technique. It involves experience, so it can't be taught
directly. When you have enough experience working in and around the legal
field, or government, or the military, or anything that involves the
interaction of bureaucracy and power, you develop, over time, a feeling for
what it takes to get certain things done. Without intervention, the wheels of
justice, and government, grind very slowly. So when I see something happen too
quickly, or when I see powerful legal roadblocks brushed aside with ease, I
know that someone behind the scenes has tapped into some form of power
structure to gain an advantage. You then proceed to find out who is pulling
the strings. The trouble with the normal person is that he too easily accepts
the simplistic media version (which always omits key information) and fails to
ask tough questions about contradictions with reality that an experienced
person would see. For example, in the Filegate Scandal, the media focused on
why the White House had hundreds of FBI files on Republican Congressmen and
staffers. The experienced person would see another more important issue--that
it was also illegal for the FBI to spy on conservative, law-abiding citizens.
So, the real question is, "What was the FBI doing with these files?"
The answer of this question leads to the inevitable discovery of illegal
government operations on a fairly broad scale. By the way, the media are
trained to see these kinds of contradictions, and ask probing questions. When
they fail to do so on obvious key issues, it almost always means they are
covering for something or someone. In the Elian Gozales case, savvy observers
see numerous anomalies with reality and are asking questions like, "How
is it that Juan Miguel, the father, has the costly legal services of Gregory
Craig, Clinton's own personal impeachment attorney?" "Who made the
arrangements?" and "who's paying the bill?" Robert Novak
reported in the Washington Times that the left-leaning United Methodist Church
is paying Craig's high fees from a special fund created by donors who
"wish to remain anonymous." Anyone who thinks these instant big
dollar donors are ordinary members of the Methodist Church doesn't know how
the real world works.
And, lest you think this is just benevolent liberal charity to help an
indigent father get back his son, we have to ask, "Why did Greg Craig
travel twice, in secret, to Cuba?....to meet with Juan Miguel?" Nope-- to
meet personally with Fidel Castro!" One disgruntled government agent
leaked to Cuban-American leader Diaz-Balart a secret memo from Craig to the
White House, stating that he (Craig) "provided Castro with sufficient
guarantees that US security personnel would make certain that Elian's father
will not be allowed to defect." Again, with experience one should know
that Craig couldn't have made those assurances without prior instructions from
the government. This, of course, implies that the US government is working
directly against persons who may be seeking asylum from a Communist tyranny.
We can also infer that the Castro-Clinton team knows that Juan Miguel is being
forced to play a role, and that they believe there is a high probability that
Juan Miguel would try to defect.
Here is another interesting question. How is it that the Miami relatives
ended up with Kendall Coffey as their attorney in the Elian case? Coffey is a
long-time Democratic collaborator with Janet Reno when Reno was Attorney
General of Florida. He was chosen by Reno to head up the US Attorney's office
in Miami. Coffey had raised money for Reno to fund her election campaigns.
Coffey offered his services to the Miami Cubans at near pro-bono rates, and,
in my opinion, will play a key role in undermining Elian's case when it gets
before the courts (who often skew the law to protect the dark side of
government). Coffey's presence is particularly offensive to some Cuban
Americans since he was forced to resign as US attorney in disgrace after he
was accused of biting a lap dancer on the derriere in a notorious Miami
striptease club. I'm sure Coffey sold his services to the Miami relatives on
his ability to gain access to Janet Reno. That's an understatement! But, in
reality, Coffey's presence is typical of dark side operations where they
attempt to infiltrate and control both sides of any legal battle.
There's more. How is it that the pediatrician advising the Justice
Department on how best to handle Elian Gonzalez is a long-time Clinton
confidant and former member of Hillary's health care task force? Only reliable
Clinton cronies were allowed on this secretive panel. Predictably, Dr. Irwin
Redlener told the press that Elian is being "horrendously exploited"
and should be immediately removed from Miami relatives' home. Still not
convinced there is collusion going on? Read on.
RENO GETS A PHONE CALL
Finally, there is Janet Reno's admission to the Mayor of Miami that she got
a controlling phone call directing her actions. All savvy government watchers
know that lower level subordinates and high level leaders get private phone
calls from time to time directing their actions. Sadly only the dark side of
government has the right to tap government phones, and the FBI isn't about to
reveal the secret collusion of its ultimate leaders. Occasionally a mid level
official or judge will let it slip that he "got a phone call"
directing how he should rule in a case. Here we have a similar slip that was
not meant to become public.
Mayor Corollo of Miami said that during his negotiations with the Attorney
General, that Reno had suggested bringing both sides of the family together in
a government secured compound (that would ring warning bells for me) for a
period of up to two weeks, where the Miami relatives and Elian's father would
determine the boy's custody amongst themselves. By the next day Corollo said
that Reno had reneged on the offer, without explanation. On a WABC broadcast
Corollo told of his follow-up conversation with Janet Reno:
"The following day, Wednesday, I called her from my office...In fact,
we had several telephone conferences with her. I was present and my colleague,
the mayor of Miami-Dade County was also present in my office. And I said to
her, 'Madam Attorney General, why was it that when we left your office on
Tuesday we had at least an agreement from you that you were going to be flying
to Miami the next day. You said that you would call both of us later on, on
Tuesday evening so that we could give you the list of people and go over the
locations where you could meet with the different leaders that you said you
wanted us to bring to you to meet with in Miami. And you've never called us.
Why? And the answer that she gave me was, 'Mr. Mayor, I received a phone
call.'" Corollo said Reno refused to elaborate or say who it was who
directed her actions. Don't be too quick to assume it was Clinton. There are
other bosses as well.
Last week I mentioned the US government's drug connections with Cuba as
well as the long-term globalist agenda of gaining normal trade relations with
Cuba. Cuban-American leader Diaz-Balart also believes that the left's quest
for normalization of relations with Cuba is the underlying reason for making
Elian a cause celebre. He feels that there are numerous forces working to
discredit and undermine the credibility of the Miami Cuban-American community,
who stand as a major political obstacle against recognition of Cuba. He notes,
correctly, how the media is constantly trying to bait Cubans who are keeping a
vigil around Elian's home. The cameras never show films of the peaceful
candlelight prayer vigils, but only of the few moments each day when the
Cubans are induced to counter the press' provocative challenges and questions.
Those shots of angry faces are all that air on the evening news.
Also notably omitted from news coverage are the items that would correctly
showcase Castro's threatening speeches about Elian on Cuban radio, including
his openly stated plans to house Elian and his father in a special building
with integral school facilities to reindoctrinate Elian when he returns.
Anyone who thinks a Cuban father will have American style custody and parental
rights in Cuba does not know how the world works in a Stalinist regime. The
media has also carefully evaded the airing of the charges by Elian's mother's
relatives recounting in a sworn affidavit of the physical abuse Juan Miguel
inflicted upon Elian's mother, Elizabeth, during their marriage--in one case,
causing her to be hospitalized.
