 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiming in for GWE
PeekReplying to:
A Vote of Confidence for GWE
From: <freeenergy@juno.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: GWE Update - third application to be announced
Aug 2003
My feeling on it is that since GWE allows peeks into their technology and attempts to explains the workings they MAY be legitimate. Before GWE, Xogen (US Patent #6,126,794; 1998) discovered a way to separate the atoms in water: http://www.tathacus.ca/xogen.html and before Xogen, Ronald Papineau (U.S. Patent #3,967,589; July 6 1976) built an on-demand hydrogen/oxygen generator that uses a reformer like a fuel cell and could self perpetuate (link to U.S. patent site) Since there are also many others over the years who have researched hydrogen on demand I am less
skeptical of GWE. RebuttalWhen the inside photos were first released a few months ago, Eric Krieg pointed out that this does not constitute proof. A device could be made for theatrical purposes, to put on a show.
See alsoPosted by SDA June 11, 2003 |
|
|
