You are here: Greater Things > News > Daily > Sept. 9, 2005

Marketing Social Darwinism: Emergency Services

Media silence concerning the extent of damage and number of deaths allows expropriation and displacement of the poor. This is being sold to the public as the way that a free and responsible society would act. Meanwhile, executive orders have created a monster that allows everything to be confiscated, and citizens converted to slave gangs.

by Mary-Sue Haliburton
Greater Things News Service
Copyright © 2005


Entertainment

Supervolcano, a dramatization of what would happen if the Yellowstone Cauldera were to erupt, aired last spring and repeated recently. (Ref.) The story depicts an actual eruption which spews volcanic ash, trapping twenty-five million people in a wide swath of devastation. No aircraft can fly through this (the engines stop) and if people or animals attempt to travel without breathing apparatus the ash converts to cement in the lungs and they die.

A senator overseeing the mess wonders aloud about when they can start rescue operations. A vulcanist, in refuge in an underground military facility, says it’s impossible because they won’t have the fuel or the resources or enough vehicles to go in and get people – if there were roads visible or airstrips cleared for landing. He advises waiting until the ash stops falling, and dropping water and food at rest stations. Then issue the order that those who are able should to walk to safety – hundreds of miles in many cases. Obviously only those who are strong could make the journey. A perfect case of “survival of the fittest” portrayed as necessary, admirable, and socially or politically inevitable.

FEMA and the government analysts are portrayed as heroes. At the end of the movie the FEMA spokesperson – portrayed, contrary to real life, as a personable woman with a conscience – credits “Walk for Life” as the means of saving seven million people.

What happened to the other eighteen million? We are left to guess, but it must have been the same as the fate that overtook citizens of Pompeii. As the ash begins to fall, the film’s protagonist refers to that historical volcanic destruction of an ancient city. All he says is that the citizens of Pompeii stayed in their homes. “Know how we know that?” This alludes to, but does not elaborate on, the air-pockets found in the excavation, which plaster casts revealed to be left after the bodies dissolved. (You were expected to have just watched the documentary about that earlier.)

As that was the clincher argument for not waiting in a car snarled in a massive traffic jam, he and his companion exit their vehicle without further discussion and hot-foot it toward the bunker. He knew that no one else would survive, and that a vehicle would be useless. Note that he also does not alert any of the other would-be travelers. As the bunker is very small, they must be left to their fate. Survival of the fittest in this case means the one with insider knowledge and the job status to be admitted to safety will get out alive. No one else qualifies.


News

The news media are quietly or overtly espousing the same doctrine in relation to the situation in New Orleans following the flooding in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Shortly before the storm, we heard that city’s mayor was calling for evacuation, and we saw footage of cars bumper to bumper on highways, apparently leaving the city. However, it became clear soon after that thousands had not left, and that most of these lived in low-lying, poor districts. A significant number were confined to hospitals and care facilities. Implicit in such a “voluntary” evacuation order is the Social-Darwinistic notion that only those who are healthy, “successful” by materialist standards, and who can afford personal vehicles or airline tickets will evacuate. All others are just expendable.

A week later, all news media are quoting the revised order that evacuation is now mandatory due to the threat of disease, implying that those still in the city are actually refusing to leave. However, not having boats, they are unable to leave by themselves. Citizen-initiated convoys and flotillas have attempted to reach them and effect a rescue, but are being turned back. Jason Robideaux, a lawyer, reports that “authorities” who are blocking the rescuers appeared to be just standing around, and not actually saving anyone themselves. And why would it be the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries that is preventing the rescue of patients and staff immured in a charity hospital without supplies, water, or electricity? (Ref.) Something is wrong with this picture.


Planning, not Ineptitude

Excuses that the government didn’t know what was going to happen, or was not prepared for the extent of the emergency, are not credible. Just what did become of the billions of dollars supposedly put into emergency preparedness?

It is becoming apparent that the authorities do not want either to rescue these people themselves, or to allow them to be rescued by others even at their own expense. Despite all the verbiage and promises, all the money pouring into the Red Cross, all the military and national-guard vehicles and personnel, little was done in a timely manner. All deaths will be blamed on the storm, although the means to save lives was available. Those lives were not on the schedule to be saved. Although the words are not being used explicitly, if we look instead of just listening to misleading commentary, what we are watching is starting to look like an intentional massacre.


Corporatized Charities Reflect Official Negativity

In an article advocating community sponsorship of refugees, Sterling Allan cites the opinions of one Bill Holterstrom, CEO of United Way in Utah County, who argues that security and culture shock are reasons not to extend personal charity.
“Some have chemical addictions, and/or have been members of dangerous gangs, and/or are accustomed to a life of crime. Also rampant are problems with sexual addiction and abuse.” (Ref.)

Watching the looting while police stand by, one would conclude that it was not the people stereotyped above who were waiting in shelters for re-settlement. It was those with addictions, and gang members, who were out trying to grab everything they could. If they are criminals they should have to face the law, but everyone else should not be tarred with the same brush.

This “charity” official also indicated that it was not policy to raise a person “more than one social strata [sic] at a time”. Moving up to a better standard would be “too much of a shock," Holterstrom is quoted as saying. Therefore, as a matter of policy, they keep evacuees contained in shelters and do not play the role of matching evacuees with people willing to take them into their home.

It is a bit difficult to respect this type of reasoning. First of all, the “culture shock” has already occurred in going from having private lives in apartments or homes to being mere flotsam, to be interned for months or years with no hope of being anything but a recipient of charity. (Ref.) That's a bigger culture shock to anyone regardless of social status, than perhaps meeting up with people who can help them get back on their feet, away from the cattle-corral situation of a refugee camp. Any comforts added to the life of someone finding himself adrift like that would be a relief, not a shock.

Moreover, many don't fit this stereotype of drug addicts, gangsters, and losers. The Canadian weather channel aired an interview three days after the storm with a man who lost his business, home and all possessions within an hour. Here's a responsible individual who now has nothing, but who is capable of managing a business. Such persons would be a genuine asset to a new region. Many others will have lost jobs because these businesses no longer exist. None of these deserves to have such a stereotype applied.

And it’s not the moving up that would be a problem for the displaced person, but being shoved back down into low-income housing that would be hard, if they are to be kept in camps and forced to go back afterwards. If New Orleans is to be rebuilt for higher-income residents, even that shock of going back to lower-quality homes will not be offered to the city’s poor. If individual refugees don't have family or friends, then the stated official reason to keep them near the site of the disaster is invalid; they must be re-located as soon as possible. Extended families should be given the opportunity to re-locate to the same region.


Healthy Charity Helps Heal Damaged Societies

In refugee resettlement, at least as practised in Canada, it’s normal for the sponsoring church or other community group to provide the Canadian standard of living, even if it’s way above what the refugee from Africa or Asia might have known at home. The usual response is that the person is motivated to learn English and work hard to maintain the improved standard. And if there’s any culture shock, it’s merely expected that displacement to another climate and away from family would be hard, but it’s not impossible with the new support group. Holterstrom’s argument sounds more like a type of Social Darwinism infecting even the charity organization. That is, the poor must not be allowed any “free ride” which by definition they as losers don’t deserve.

The most effective spending of the “charity” dollar would be to put in into direct help to families or individuals. When aircraft were grounded for a week in September 2001, about ten thousand Americans were stranded in Gander, Newfoundland. But they were not crammed into an overheated building to fend for themselves and fight over scraps while toilets overflowed and armed guards kept local people away. The picture was much different.

The Newfoundland Example

Gander, Nfld. is a small town with a handful of bed-and-breakfast places, and no large hotels. But it boasts a hardy population who care deeply about the well-being of others. Despite – or maybe because of – centuries of struggle with the harsh ocean, the people did not become cold and harsh themselves, but are generous and caring. Newfoundlanders took strangers into their homes, and shared unstintingly with those who were housed in a local school. Relationships formed, some very close. A year later, one host couple were surprised to receive plane tickets in the mail. Their grateful guests had invited them to come south for a visit, all expenses paid. (Ref.) This is the effect of healthy charity in operation: the fabric of society is strengthened, across all national or cultural lines.

Culture shock and social stratification were not principles to be guarded, but were completely ignored. Social Darwinism was nowhere to be seen in Newfoundland when American travelers were in need. So why are Americans expected to treat each other with suspicion and to reinforce class divisions in what is supposed to be the classless society? If the charity organization is promoting an attitude contrary to the motive for donating money, keep yours in your pocket unless you can donate directly to a fellow-human in need. Or at least earmark the donation for “refugee/sponsor matching”. Then if the organization fails to use it for the specified purpose, there is a case for taking money under false pretences.

The Reconstruction Insanity

As if no lives were in danger, George W. Bush smiled as he talked about the restoration of the city, and that there would be better houses built to replace those that are destroyed. “I’ll come and sit on the porch,” he quips in one televised sound byte. It is becoming painfully clear that these better houses are not going to be built for the original residents. Despite the location below sea level, despite the flooding, New Orleans is still regarded as prime real estate, and expensive new houses are to replace the shabby, cheap ones and low-rent apartments.

Given this official welcome of urban renewal, any idea that others should send aid for reconstruction is probably not appropriate. It’s a commercial venture for which profits are expected, and residents of a higher tax bracket are going to be moving in. For these more desirable occupants, it will be worthwhile to repair the levees which had been neglected seriously in the past few years. Funding cuts prevented repairs, while the money poured like floodwaters through a dike breach into Homeland Security.

It is illogical to build below sea level. Even the Netherlands is seeing the handwriting on the seawall, and has plans to withdraw from its lowest lands if or when it becomes necessary. Meanwhile the Dutch are building floating homes, with basements filled with Styrofoam. (Ref.)

If flooding occurs again in the brand-spanking-new New Orleans, evacuation and repair should be at the expense of the beneficiaries of this expropriation. Who would insure the reconstructed New Orleans ¬– the better city with new upscale housing? This is the real puzzle. If flood insurance is not available at all, then it’s a mystery why people would take the risk.

But if the theory is true that the storm was intentionally directed, and weather control is capable of choosing targets, then once the wealthy are ensconced in spiffy new homes on this deep pocket of land with expensive reinforced levees, the storms will be directed elsewhere. The job of the weather controllers, to displace the unwanted, will have been done. (Ref.)

A Depopulation Policy at Work

This phenomenon of displacing people for economic reasons is well known in history. In the “Highland Clearances”, Scottish people were thrown off the land and replaced with sheep, which were seen as more profitable for the landlord. With no place to go in their own country, many fled to North America, notably the province in Canada called Nova Scotia (New Scotland). Scots Gaelic was widely spoken there in the nineteenth century and might have continued, but school authorities worked hard to stamp it out of the youth about a century ago. Only a few elderly native speakers of this language remain in isolated areas in Cape Breton Island.

More recently, Hurricane Andrew swept away whole trailer parks and flimsy low-rent apartments – and, incidentally, their occupants – to make room for upscale housing. As survivor kt frankovich has pointed out, Dade county was never evacuated. Most of its residents did not escape the storm’s extreme violence. Injured herself, she was denied care and even threatened. (Ref.)

Although the official death count of Andrew remains in the low dozens, Frankovich and other on-site witnesses saw thousands of bodies being fished out of the wreckage and trucked away, to where remained unclear. But unless someone can find gravestones for thousands with the date of death being that of the hurricane, those bodies must have disposed of, probably cremated and scattered without ceremony. Expendable. Social Darwinism decrees that the fittest, i.e. wealthiest, must win, even if they are predators who take from the “unfit” general population.

Because there was a successful blackout on news about Andrew’s effects from on-the-ground reporters, and volunteers offering help were kept out, the majority of American still do not realize the death toll, or see through the purpose of hiding the numbers of dead. The old saw about “causing public panic” is a smokescreen. Thirteen years later there’s a real estate boom in the area, and upscale homes being built on this valuable real estate, now conveniently cleared of riff-raff and illegal migrants. (Ref.)

Based on how politicians and law enforcement were behaving in that storm aftermath, which is the same as during the current situation, the official approach to a major hurricane seems to be to take advantage of it. It’s an opportunity for “lowland clearances” that will make way for urban renewal. Disguised as a “natural” disaster, this is mass expropriation without a political cost. Former owners are conveniently eliminated and not able to object.


Hardening Populace to Expect the Worst

The front-page image of thousands standing futilely waiting for rescue is, in its subtle way, more devastating psychologically for the American people than the repeated tape loop of the World Trade Center demolitions. At that time, the message was that foreign terrorists did this to us, and now we have to fight a war against “them” to protect “our way of life” and other such memes.

This time the message is a bit different. This time it screams out that all of us must regard lives of fellow-citizens as worthless. We are all supposed to accept that those people are losers who will just have to wait to die and we should not care personally what happens to them. You have to be smart, and move fast, or you are not worthy of life. No one will lift a finger to save you. This is the Social Darwinism that is being forced on everyone as rescuers are stopped from giving the help that springs from caring.

The ancient value system of love and support for fellow humans is being trampled underfoot. Non-compliant people will not just be prevented from helping. In this official New World Order, the good Samaritans are likely also to be ridiculed, silenced, and perhaps even arrested for obstructing the harsh “law” of survival of the fittest, i.e., the wealthiest.


Do Any Other Options Remain?

How did we get to this point? We did it by being asleep, failing to question all the signs pointing to a growing cancer in the body politic. People just waved flags and followed the leader, and voted for the slick package promising safety and security. The sinister side has been well hidden behind the rhetoric, but is nasty face is beginning to peep through the mask as authorities deny rescue to masses of people. They are left to stand, even the sick and injured are left, in full view of the TV cameras. Viewer response is now crucial. Will everyone just let their hearts be hardened, or will the love for fellow-human be reactivated in rejection of this brutality?

If it is true that the imposition of martial law will result in mass arrests, the creation of a new gulag for any who are to protest government policy, and even mass execution of resistors, it will be too late to do anything about it. Executive orders from the president created FEMA as an agency with power to dispossess all citizens, confiscate all transit, restrict freedom of movement, and exert power of life and death over everyone. (Ref.)

While one hopes that this worst-case scenario is never going to be put into operation, the behavior of authorities in New Orleans makes it look likely to be more devastating than even the fevered imagination of the most dedicated conspiracy buff could conjure up. We will be left to pray and hope for a better day for the few, likely genetically-altered, survivors after all the radioactive dust of the DU weapons settles.

# # #

REFERENCES

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117926757?categoryid=32&cs=1  Typical review of film shot in Vancouver and Yellowstone.

http://www.rense.com/general67/cit.htm  Expressing incredulity at official actions, a lawyer describes well-organized citizen initiative to save patients.

http://www.projectassimilate.org/news/..._Project_Assimilate_Katrina_Refugees/  Quotes from charity “CEO” reflect prevailing assumptions of society.

Newfoundland hospitality is legendary; this incident and many other examples were portrayed with interview footage in a Canadian documentary televised last year. The author of this essay remembers the visual details but not which Canadian broadcaster aired this report.

http://www.ecoboot.nl/artikelen/floating_houses.php  Designs for floating villages that would make sense for New Orleans and similar sea-level and below dwellings. Moored towns, and moving houses using tugboats would be an option for the future of places like New Orleans which are below the level of a rising sea.
In a televised documentary on Discovery channel about Holland’s response to rising sea levels, planners discussed examples of basements full of Styrofoam. These houses were fastened with sliding connections to poles anchored in bedrock. Then when there is heavy flooding from upriver, or a tidal surge overwhelms the dikes, the house rises up with the waters and then is lowered back down as they recede. Sort of like individual Noah's Arks in the delta areas of Holland.

http://www.geocities.com/marksrealm/project337.html  Weather control as scientific reality, patents outlined for technology.

http://www.whereheavensmeet.com/andrew/ch25txt.html
Culture shock of sudden destruction and injury as lived by survivors of Hurricane Andrew.

http://www.bariumblues.com/deadly_silences.htm  One account of Andrew survivors published in “fringe press” Nexus.

http://tampabay.indymedia.org/...2005/Jul/35712.796875.dat  13 years after extent of Andrew disaster covered up, real estate booms in South Dade County – not for original residents including illegal migrants who are assumed to be among the missing.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/femaoverview06sep05.shtml
Wording of executive orders shows what country can expect under full-scale martial law. The government is said to be waiting for a sufficient justification to initiate it.  Shows what country can expect.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/7/02749/28047
Medical  Worker said that by Sept. 6, 43,000 body bags had been used in New Orleans  alone.

Additional Reading:




Page composed by Sterling D. Allan Sept. 9, 2005
Page last updated September 26, 2005