Feedback to 'Prince Charles of Wales -- Anti-Christ or Davidic Servant?'

Original Post

Feedback

Sterling's Reply

Nate,

Thanks for speaking your mind.

I guess the difference between this and 'the onion' is that this is real, or a sincere attempt at real.

Don't you find it even the slightest bit noteworthy that the word for "mark" is one page before page 666, and the word for 666 is three pages hence, and page 666 itself has the word "grace" which is about as opposite a word as one could imagine -- and that "Charles" inserts alphabetically on page 667? And that the word by the same number as the word for "mark" in Greek means "anoint" in Hebrew -- another opposite.

I would say this study is one of the most strong validations of the whole alphabetics approach that I've done yet. It illustrates profoundly several of the key 'tools' of alphabetics -- (1) vicinity significance (words nearby alphabetically being applicable); (2) page number significance; (3) word-number correlations; (4) opposites; (5) number manipulations (9 flipped 180 degrees = 6); (6) synchronicity of the circumstances of the discovery being encoded as well; (7) alphabetic insertion of non-Bible words (which in this case tie in to 666 through other means as well, this being a second witness); etc.;

It also illustrates that ultimately these things don't "prove" anything, but they sure do give you something to think about so far as probable futures. The work of "proving" is left to the Spirit and to agency.

Sterling
March 21, 2001; 8:15 am

From: "Robert Sandberg" <rpsandberg@hotmail.com>
To: <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Prince Charles of Wales -- Anti-Christ or Davidic Servant?


Hello Sterling, I must say that, as always, I am impressed by your scholarship and your willingness to look beyond the surface of things and to dig deeper in search of the truth. I have wondered about Prince Charles myself. I surely hope the alternative possibilities you have uncovered are the ones that will eventually prevail.

{snip}

Best wishes, Bob Sandberg

As for the Anti Christ role, oddly enough it would fit much better for Charles' father, Prince Philip, husband of Queen Elizabeth.  Philip is the top dog of world Freemasonry, and has actually stated something weird like saying he'd like to reincarnate as a virus to reduce world's population.  How would a father / son relationship fit into your elaborations????
Dave Gaefke

From: "joel acheson" <joeljed@hotmail.com>
To: <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Prince Charles of Wales -- Anti-Christ or Davidic Servant?

Hi Sterling

Interesting post. Methinks thou must have been visiting the Lion and the Lamb website, as he has been propounding the P.Charles/Antichrist message for some years, now. He makes a lot of sense, as well. I have arrived at the opinion that it really doesn't make a lick of difference to me who he will be. The simple fact is that God said he will exist and perform his role, and the specific identity is not relevant to me. I guess I feel the same way about the One Mighty and Strong - it doesn't really matter who he is, knowing the identity wouldn't really make a difference in my life, I still must put one foot in front of the other as the Lord leads me until whenever the soup hits the fan. Then I know that He will give me whatever knowledge at that time.

Thanx, Joel

From: "Joseph Liberty" <joseph@p...>
Date: Thu Mar 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: Prince Charles of Wales -- Anti-Christ or Davidic Servant?


I read the article. Twice now.

I still have the same questions. I don't see what difference it makes what is on what page of Thayer's and I don't understand what is special about p.667. 666 I get, but not 667.

I wasn't criticizing. I just don't understand what you wrote. I understand your conclusion: Prince Charles is an important figure in Biblical prophecy. I just don't see how you got there.

Sterling's Response to Joe

From: "Sterling D. Allan" <sterlingda@p...>
Date: Thu Mar 21, 2002 9:39 pm
Subject: Re: Prince Charles of Wales -- Anti-Christ or Davidic Servant?


When you read a verse in the scriptures, you also read the verses before and after it go get a "context."

What I have discovered is that words in their alphabetical sequence are the same way. The words before and after a given word very often shed light on the meaning of a given word.

The numbers associated with them are the same way.

A proof that this is an intended phenomenon is found in the fact that the word for "mark" is on page 665, just one page prior to 666. And the word for 666 is on page 669, just three pages after it.

So the fact that "Charles" spelled with Greek letters inserts alphabetically on page 667, of this same lexicon (dictionary of all the words of the New Testament [Greek] listed alphabetically), is very significant.

Does that help?

Sterling

From: "LI LI" <lilichris92@hotmail.com>
To: <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 12:57 AM
Subject: GTcontact


Dear Friends

I was searching the net for an article that would deal with the "Prince Charles" antichrist theory.

I read Fritz Springmeyer and others who propound the theory that Charles or Prince William will be the big "boogey man."

It looked extremely convincing given that the Bible refers to this human being as a "Prince", "King", etc.

These articles also mercilessly attacked the British Israel truth which we know provides the ONLY answer as to the greatness of Britain and the USA.

I want to say that your article on Prince Charles not only makes sense, but adequately answers Springmeyer and others (David Icke) and their seeming focus on Satanism within the Royal lines.

Thank you for this incredible insight and please publish this email.

Again thank you and please reply.

Chris Newnham

Return to original study